Wenn einer departure gemacht hat und der andere go-around, sollte man mal mit dem tower reden
Den NTSB-Link aber schon gelesen, oder?
Zitat:
According to the TCAS report from the A319 crew, that aircraft was approaching ANC when, because of the effects of tailwinds on the aircraft's approach path, the crew initiated a missed approach and requested new instructions from air traffic control. The tower controller instructed the A319 to turn right heading 300 and report the departing B747 in sight. After the A319 crew reported the B747 in sight, the controller instructed the A319 to maintain visual separation from the B747, climb to 3000 feet, and turn right heading 320. The A319 crew refused the right turn because the turn would have put their flight in direct conflict with the B747. The A319 crew then received a resolution advisory to "monitor vertical speed" and the crew complied with the descent command. During the descent, the A319 crew lost sight of the B747. At about 1700 feet above ground level, the A319 crew received a "clear of conflict" aural command.Somit ist wohl der Tower nicht ganz unschuldig gewesen.
Die Runways waren übrigens unterschiedlich:
A319: 14
B747: 25R
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/ANC_airport_map.PNGIch persönlich frage mich eher, warum die B747 ein "Cleared for Takeoff" bekommen hat (wenn überhaupt), aber noch eine Maschine (A319) im Final auf die 14 war (respektive anders herum).
Warten wir mal auf den endgültigen Bericht.